Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Nonacute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock

By sjmartinez • May 29, 2024

Watanabe A, Miyamoto Y, Ueyama H, Gotanda H, Tsugawa Y, Kuno T. Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Nonacute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 28:e034645. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034645. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38804220.

Tags: cardiogenic shock, Cedars Sinai DoM, endovascular procedures, General Internal Medicine, heart‐assist device, mechanical circulatory support, Medicare, Publications

Related Posts

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels 2 to 7 Years After Delivery: The nuMoM2b Heart Health Study

Freaney PM, Huang X, Petito LC, Grobman WA, Catov J, Hauspurg A, Bairey Merz CN, Bello N, Kim JK, Lane A, Haas DM, Levine LD,[...]

Effectiveness of mailed versus in-person PAP initiation in VA’s TeleSleep program

Gomez A, Sarmiento KF, Smith C, Mitchell M, Lee D, Totten A, Sanders E, Ryden AM, Seo J, Bhattacharyya S, Harris B, Mempin R, Moghtaderi[...]

Feasibility of frequent monitoring of symptoms using the PRO-CTCAE in the NRG-BR004 clinical trial

Bandos H, Kim S, Henry NL, Hays RD, Calsavara VF, Luu M, Gresham G, Lu KY, Irvin WJ, Suga JM, Siddique S, Cecchini RS, Rogatko[...]