Panel stacking is a threat to consensus statement validity

By sjmartinez • June 20, 2024

Kepp KP, Aavitsland P, Ballin M, Balloux F, Baral S, Bardosh K, Bauchner H, Bendavid E, Bhopal R, Blumstein DT, Boffetta P, Bourgeois F, Brufsky A, Collignon PJ, Cripps S, Cristea IA, Curtis N, Djulbegovic B, Faude O, Flacco ME, Guyatt GH, Hajishengallis G, Hemkens LG, Hoffmann T, Joffe AR, Klassen TP, Koletsi D, Kontoyiannis DP, Kuhl E, La Vecchia C, Lallukka T, Lambris J, Levitt M, Makridakis S, Maltezou HC, Manzoli L, Marusic A, Mavragani C, Moher D, Mol BW, Muka T, Naudet F, Noble PW, Nordström A, Nordström P, Pandis N, Papatheodorou S, Patel CJ, Petersen I, Pilz S, Plesnila N, Ponsonby AL, Rivas MA, Saltelli A, Schabus M, Schippers MC, Schünemann H, Solmi M, Stang A, Streeck H, Sturmberg JP, Thabane L, Thombs BD, Tsakris A, Wood SN, Ioannidis JPA. Panel stacking is a threat to consensus statement validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jun 17:111428. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111428. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38897481.

Tags: competing interests, consensus statements, Evidence based medicine, guidelines, panel bias, Publications, Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, transparency

Related Posts

Blinatumomab Nonresponse Correlates with Poor Survival After Brexucabtagene

Srinagesh HK, Gupta VK, Zhang A, Grunwald MR, Connor MP, Kota VK, Boccucci J, Ulrickson ML, Pradeep R, Hill LC, Tsai SB, O'Connor TE, Sandhu[...]

Reperfusion Strategies for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Design and Rationale of RECONNECT-PE – a Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Farmakis IT, Binder H, Chopard R, Christodoulou KC, Evrenoglou T, Fengler K, Giri J, Hobohm L, Jaber WA, Klok FA, Kocka V, Kroupa J, Kucher[...]

Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Body vs. Conventionally Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Shimizu T, Zheng S, Maeda S, Link J, Deranteriassian A, Premji A, King J, Girgis M, Hines OJ, Wainberg Z, Raldow A, He J, Burns[...]